0.0
of 8
Above Average
Top 16%

Score Breakdown

4.0
Baseline
→
5.0
Final
+0.60

Deep-set 'Hunter' Eyes & Brow Ridge Support

Strong brow ridge with deep orbital sockets and minimal eyelid exposure provides elite eye morphology.

+0.50

Bone Structure & FWHR

High zygomatic breadth and wide jaw structure create excellent facial robusticity.

+0.30

Facial Thirds and Midface Compactness

Optimal midface ratio (0.92) prevents vertical elongation.

-0.20

Hairline / Temporal Recession

Visible temple recession reduces upper facial frame youthfulness.

-0.20

Skin Texture & Lip Fullness

Thin lips and hyper-shadowed, harsh soft tissue reduce overall freshness.

Scoring Rationale

Base average 4.0 plus net +1.0 adjustments yields a final score of 5.0 PSL (Top ~15-20% bone structure offset by non-standard aesthetic presentation).

Feature Analysis

Deep-set orbits with intense scleral illumination/glow, strong supraorbital overhang, minimal upper eyelid exposure, and neutral-to-slightly positive canthal tilt.

Positives

Extremely deep-set eyes with excellent orbital support, low upper eyelid exposure (hunter eyes phenotype), and striking contrast.

Areas for Improvement

Asymmetrical lighting and unnatural iris/scleral glow detract from natural harmony.

Buzz cut or closely cropped/shaved hair with a high, squared hairline showing early temporal recession.

Positives

Clean, low-maintenance presentation that highlights cranial frame and supraorbital ridge.

Areas for Improvement

High Norwood hairline with visible temporal recession reducing upper facial third compactness.

Compressed, thin vermilion borders with tight labial closure and compact philtrum length.

Positives

Short philtrum to chin ratio maintains lower third proportions.

Areas for Improvement

Thin upper and lower lips reduce soft tissue fullness.

Straight dorsal bridge with wide alar base and neutral nasal tip projection.

Positives

Strong, straight dorsal profile and robust nasal bone anchor the midface well.

Areas for Improvement

Alar base width slightly exceeds intercanthal distance.

Textured, dark olive to hyper-pigmented undertones with heavy shadowing, severe lean dryness, and pronounced lines.

Positives

High contrast and extreme lean dryness highlight underlying skeletal contours.

Areas for Improvement

Lack of youthful soft-tissue fullness, heavy shadowing, and uneven texture.

Highly defined, square mandibular frame supported by hand resting on chin; low gonial angle and prominent chin width.

Positives

Exceptional mandibular definition, strong chin projection, and distinct jaw angularity.

Areas for Improvement

Partial occlusion of the left gonial angle by hand posture.

Compact midface ratio with high, prominent zygomatic arches and deep subzygomatic hollows.

Positives

Exceptional cheekbone prominence (zygomatic breadth) creating strong lateral facial width and angularity.

Areas for Improvement

Severe subzygomatic hollows due to extreme lean tissue state.

Prominent, steep forehead slope with visible glabella definition and compact upper third proportion.

Positives

Strong glabella and supraorbital integration creating a hyper-masculine forehead profile.

Areas for Improvement

Slightly compressed vertical height due to muscular furrowing.

Quantitative Measurements

Proportions

Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (FWHR)1.95
Ideal:1.90 - 2.15 (Masculine)

High FWHR indicates strong bizygomatic width and masculine skull structure.

Midface Ratio0.92
Ideal:0.90 - 1.00

Compact midface distance prevents long-face appearance and enhances attractiveness.

Intercanthal to Nasal Base Ratio1.15
Ideal:1.00

Nasal base is wider than the distance between inner eye corners.

Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio0.82
Ideal:0.75 - 0.82

Strong lower jaw width relative to cheekbones gives a sturdy, masculine frame.

Philtrum to Chin Ratio1:2.8
Ideal:1:2.0 - 1:2.5

Slightly taller chin relative to philtrum emphasizes masculine chin mass.

Mouth to Nose Width Ratio1.35
Ideal:1.50

Mouth is somewhat narrow relative to nasal width.

Facial Thirds Balance32% : 35% : 33%
Ideal:33% : 33% : 33%

Highly balanced vertical proportions across upper, middle, and lower thirds.

Symmetry

Canthal Tilt+2 degrees
Ideal:0 to +5 degrees

Slight positive tilt adds positive aesthetic energy to the eye area.

Gonial Angle118 degrees
Ideal:115 - 125 degrees

Sharply defined angular jaw vertex.

Structure

Upper Eyelid Exposure< 1mm
Ideal:0 - 2mm

Minimal lid exposure creates a compact, deep-set hooding effect.

Analysis Summary

Halos
Deep-set eye morphology ('hunter eyes')
High FWHR and broad zygomatic structure
Masculine jawline and chin projection
Fails
Thin vermilion border / lip fullness
Harsh/weathered skin quality and dark under-eye shadowing

Symmetry

Good

Harmony

7/10

Dimorphism

Highly Masculine

Estimated Age

35-45 years

Subject exhibits high sexual dimorphism characterized by prominent supraorbital overhang, low upper eyelid exposure, compact midface ratio, and high FWHR. Aesthetic detriments include thin lips, temporal hair recession, and intensely shadowed, weathered soft tissue skin quality.

Bone Structure vs Soft Tissue

Elite skeletal framework (bone structure) paired with lean, weathered soft tissue.

Aging Assessment

Bone structure provides excellent long-term structural support, though low skin fat/hydration accelerates weathered appearance.

Improvement Considerations

Priority Ranking

1. Skincare/Hydration -> 2. Hairline restoration -> 3. Lip volume adjustment.

Hydrating skincare routine and retinoids

Medium

Targets: Skin texture and tone

Use daily moisturizer, hyaluronic acid, and SPF to improve dry, weathered skin appearance.

Growth of hair density / scalp care

Medium

Targets: Hair and Hairline

Framing the forehead with slightly longer hair to cover temporal recession.

Not Recommended

Jaw orthognathic or malar implants (skeletal foundation is already structurally superior).

Important Notice

Consult with board-certified dermatologists and cosmetic surgeons prior to undertaking any invasive procedures.

Body Analysis

Physique assessment & development

Muscle Groups

Report generated on August 24, 2026

PSL Score: 9.9 — Facial Analysis | PSLScore