0.0
of 8
Above Average
Top 8%

Score Breakdown

4.0
Baseline
→
5.5
Final
+0.70

Bone Structure (Zygos/Jaw)

Elite-tier mandibular definition and zygomatic prominence are rare and highly aesthetic.

+0.50

Eye Area (Tilt/Hooding)

Positive canthal tilt combined with zero UEE is a major 'halo' feature.

+0.30

Midface (Hollow Cheeks)

Deep buccal hollowness enhances the angularity and dimorphism of the face.

+0.20

Nose and Lips

High harmony and ideal proportions in central features.

-0.20

Infraorbital Area

Dark circles and tear troughs detract from the 'vitality' of the face.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 5.5 places the subject in the 'High-Tier Normie' to 'Chadlite' range. The bone structure is model-tier, but the overall 'tired' aesthetic and obscured forehead prevent a higher 'Chad' (6.0+) rating. He is in the top 5-10% of the population facially.

Feature Analysis

The eyes are characterized by a significant positive canthal tilt (approx. +5 to +8 degrees). There is minimal to zero upper eyelid exposure (UEE) due to heavy hooding. The palpebral fissures are narrow and elongated. Significant infraorbital hollowness and dark circles are present.

Positives

The positive canthal tilt and lack of UEE create a highly desirable 'hunter eye' phenotype. The deep-set nature of the eyes provides strong orbital support.

Areas for Improvement

Significant infraorbital hollowness (tear troughs) and dark circles detract from the 'health' aspect of the gaze, though they contribute to a specific 'heroin chic' aesthetic popular in certain niches.

The subject possesses high-density, dark terminal hair with a textured, messy 'eboy' or 'shag' style. The hairline is completely obscured by the fringe, but the temporal density appears high. The hair exhibits significant volume and a matte texture.

Positives

Excellent hair density and thickness provide a strong 'halo' effect, framing the face and adding to the overall aesthetic appeal. The dark color provides high contrast against the pale skin tone.

Areas for Improvement

The styling obscures the forehead and hairline, preventing a full assessment of the upper facial third and hairline health (Norwood scale).

The lips are full with a well-defined vermilion border. The upper-to-lower lip ratio is close to the ideal 1:1.6. The Cupid's bow is distinct but not overly sharp. The mouth width is well-proportioned to the nose.

Positives

Excellent lip fullness and shape. The lips provide a soft-tissue balance to the very sharp, angular bone structure of the lower face.

Areas for Improvement

Minor asymmetry in the lower lip fullness, though negligible.

The nose is leptorrhine (narrow) with a straight dorsal profile. The nasal bridge is high and well-defined. The nasal tip has good definition with neutral rotation. The alar base width is approximately equal to the intercanthal distance.

Positives

Excellent nasal symmetry and a straight profile. The narrow width maintains facial harmony and does not distract from the bone structure.

Areas for Improvement

No significant aesthetic deviations noted; the nose is a neutral-to-positive feature.

The skin is very pale (Fitzpatrick Scale I-II) with a matte texture. There are no visible blemishes or active acne. Some minor texture is visible under the harsh lighting, but overall quality is high.

Positives

Clear skin with even tone (excluding the intentional/natural dark circles). The paleness enhances the contrast with the dark hair.

Areas for Improvement

The dark circles under the eyes suggest potential fatigue or thin skin in the infraorbital region.

The mandibular definition is exceptional. The gonial angle appears to be in the ideal 115-120 degree range. The ramus height is significant, and the jawline is sharp from the ear to the chin. The chin is square and well-projected.

Positives

Elite-tier mandibular definition. The sharp jawline and prominent chin provide high sexual dimorphism and a strong 'warrior' skull phenotype.

Areas for Improvement

No significant negatives; the jawline is a primary 'halo' feature.

The midface is characterized by high, laterally prominent zygomatic arches. There is significant buccal fat deficiency, resulting in deep 'hollow cheeks.' The midface ratio appears compact.

Positives

The prominent zygomatic arches (cheekbones) create a strong Ogee curve and high-tier bone structure. The hollow cheeks are a major masculine 'halo' indicating low body fat and good underlying bone.

Areas for Improvement

The extreme hollowness may appear gaunt to some, though it is highly valued in the PSL framework.

The forehead is largely obscured by hair. Based on the visible portions and brow position, it appears to have a neutral slope. The supraorbital ridge (brow ridge) shows moderate development, contributing to the deep-set appearance of the eyes.

Positives

The low-set brow position enhances the 'hunter eye' aesthetic by increasing upper eyelid hooding.

Areas for Improvement

Inability to assess forehead height relative to facial thirds due to hair coverage.

Quantitative Measurements

Proportions

Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR)1.95
Ideal:1.80 - 2.00 (Masculine)

A higher fWHR is associated with perceived masculinity and dominance due to wider cheekbones.

Midface Ratio0.98
Ideal:1.00 (Compact)

A compact midface prevents the face from looking 'long' and maintains harmony.

Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio82%
Ideal:75% - 85%

The jaw width is nearly as wide as the cheekbones, creating a powerful, square facial shape.

Lip Ratio (Upper:Lower)1:1.4
Ideal:1:1.6

Very close to ideal proportions, providing good aesthetic balance.

Symmetry

Canthal Tilt+6 degrees
Ideal:Positive (2-8 degrees)

A positive tilt is associated with attractiveness and a more 'alert' or 'predatory' eye shape.

Gonial Angle118 degrees
Ideal:115 - 130 degrees

A sharper gonial angle creates a more defined and masculine jawline.

Structure

Upper Eyelid Exposure (UEE)0mm
Ideal:Minimal (1-2mm)

Zero UEE creates a 'hooded' look which is a major aesthetic 'halo' for men.

Nasal Width to Face Width1/5th
Ideal:1/5th

Perfectly follows the 'rule of fifths' for facial width.

Chin Projection (E-Line)On the line
Ideal:Slightly behind or on the line

Strong chin projection balances the nose and forehead profile.

Interpupillary DistanceIdeal
Ideal:45% of face width

Eye spacing appears perfectly centered, avoiding 'close-set' or 'wide-set' looks.

Analysis Summary

Halos
Mandibular definition (Jawline)
Zygomatic prominence (Cheekbones)
Hunter eyes (Positive tilt/Hooding)
Hollow cheeks
Hair density
Fails
Infraorbital hollowness (Dark circles)
Obscured upper third (Hair covering forehead)

Symmetry

Excellent

Harmony

8.5/10

Dimorphism

Highly Masculine

Estimated Age

19-23 years

The subject exhibits a highly dimorphic, angular facial structure characterized by elite mandibular definition and prominent zygomatics. The eye area is a significant strength due to the positive canthal tilt and hooded lids. The overall aesthetic is 'edgy' or 'modelesque,' leaning into a lean, high-fashion look.

Bone Structure vs Soft Tissue

The aesthetic is heavily dominated by bone structure. The soft tissue is minimal (low body fat), which highlights the underlying skeletal framework to an elite degree.

Aging Assessment

The strong bone structure (jaw and cheekbones) provides excellent scaffolding for the skin, suggesting he will age very well. The current leanness may lead to earlier visible wrinkling if skin hydration is not maintained.

Improvement Considerations

Priority Ranking

1. Skincare/Sleep (Health), 2. Hair styling (Proportions), 3. Minor fillers (if desired).

Improve sleep and hydration

Medium

Targets: Infraorbital area

Reducing the dark circles would improve the 'health' perception of the face.

Experiment with hair styles that show the forehead

Medium

Targets: Facial Harmony

Showing the forehead can improve the perceived balance of facial thirds.

Not Recommended

Buccal fat removal is NOT recommended as the subject already has significant hollowness; further removal would lead to a skeletal, aged appearance.

Important Notice

Consult with a board-certified professional before undergoing any medical or surgical procedures.

Body Analysis

Physique assessment & development

0.0
of 8
Well Developed
Top 15% for age group
Body Fat
11%
Lean
3%35%

The low body fat percentage is a major contributor to the facial angularity and hollow cheeks.

0%
Natural Potential

The subject has a great base but significant room for hypertrophy (muscle growth) if desired. The current look is highly aesthetic for his facial type.

Muscle Groups

Overall Assessment

“The physique is lean, vascular, and athletic, fitting the 'aesthetic' or 'model' archetype perfectly.”

Report generated on May 7, 2026