0.0
of 8
Well Above Average
Top 0.1%

Score Breakdown

4.0
Baseline
→
6.9
Final
+0.80

Orbital Region (Hunter Eyes)

The eye area is world-class, featuring positive tilt, hooded lids, and rare coloring.

+0.80

Bone Structure (Zygos/Jaw)

Extreme zygomatic width combined with a sharp, low-angled jaw and hollow cheeks.

+0.60

Facial Harmony & Symmetry

Near-perfect symmetry and ideal ratios across all facial thirds.

+0.40

Coloring & Hair

High-contrast blonde/blue-grey coloring and exceptional hair density.

+0.30

Midface Compactness

Ideal midface ratio which is a rare and highly attractive trait.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 6.9 places the subject in the 'Elite' category (top 0.1% of the population). This is a professional model-tier face where almost every feature is a 'halo'.

Feature Analysis

The subject possesses 'hunter eyes' characterized by a significant positive canthal tilt (approx. 6-8 degrees), minimal to zero upper eyelid exposure (hooded), and deep-set positioning within the orbits. The interpupillary distance is ideal, and there is no visible scleral show. The iris color is a light, high-contrast blue/grey.

Positives

Elite positive canthal tilt; hooded lids; deep-set orbits; high-contrast color; excellent infraorbital support.

Areas for Improvement

None; this is a 'halo' feature.

The subject exhibits a thick, voluminous head of hair with a wavy texture. The color is a multi-tonal blonde with high contrast. The hairline appears to be a Norwood 0, showing no signs of recession at the temples, and is positioned low on the forehead, contributing to a compact upper facial third.

Positives

Exceptional density and volume; ideal hairline height and shape; high aesthetic contrast between hair color and skin tone.

Areas for Improvement

None significant; styling is slightly chaotic but fits the 'pretty boy' aesthetic archetype.

The lips are full with a well-defined vermilion border and a prominent cupid's bow. The ratio between the upper and lower lip is close to the 1:1.6 golden ratio. The mouth width is proportional to the facial width.

Positives

Excellent fullness; sharp definition; ideal vertical height ratio.

Areas for Improvement

None identified.

The nose is straight with a high, narrow bridge. The tip shows positive rotation (slightly upturned) and is well-defined. The alar base width is narrow, roughly equal to the intercanthal distance. The nasofrontal angle is smooth and well-integrated.

Positives

Straight dorsal profile; ideal tip definition; narrow alar width; harmonious integration with the brow.

Areas for Improvement

Slightly high tip rotation may appear feminine to some, though it fits the overall 'model' aesthetic.

The skin appears clear with an even tone and minimal visible pores. There is no evidence of acne, scarring, or significant sun damage. The texture is smooth, indicating high collagen density.

Positives

Clear complexion; even tone; high-quality texture.

Areas for Improvement

None identified.

The jawline is highly defined with a low gonial angle (approx. 115 degrees). The mandibular ramus is long, and the bigonial width is substantial, nearly matching the bizygomatic width. The chin is square and shows strong anterior projection.

Positives

Sharp mandibular definition; low gonial angle; strong chin projection; wide bigonial breadth.

Areas for Improvement

None identified.

The midface is characterized by extreme zygomatic prominence (high, wide cheekbones) and significant sub-zygomatic hollowness (hollow cheeks). The midface ratio is compact. The Ogee curve is exceptionally pronounced.

Positives

Elite zygomatic width and height; significant buccal fat deficiency creating a 'chiseled' look; excellent maxillary support.

Areas for Improvement

None identified.

The forehead is relatively short in vertical height, contributing to a compact midface-to-upper-face ratio. There is a visible supraorbital ridge (brow ridge) that provides significant masculine framing for the eyes. The slope appears slightly posterior, which is a sexually dimorphic masculine trait.

Positives

Strong supraorbital development; ideal height-to-width ratio; masculine slope.

Areas for Improvement

None identified.

Quantitative Measurements

Proportions

Midface Ratio0.95
Ideal:0.9 - 1.0

A compact midface is a primary driver of facial attractiveness in both sexes.

FWHR (Facial Width-to-Height Ratio)1.95
Ideal:1.8 - 2.0

High FWHR is associated with perceived dominance and masculine attractiveness.

Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio85%
Ideal:75-85%

A wide jaw relative to the cheekbones creates a powerful, masculine facial shape.

Lip Ratio (Upper:Lower)1:1.5
Ideal:1:1.6

Near-perfect adherence to the golden ratio for lip fullness.

Intercanthal Ratio1:3
Ideal:1:3

Perfect facial fifths alignment regarding eye spacing.

Symmetry

Canthal Tilt+7 degrees
Ideal:+5 to +8 degrees

A strong positive tilt creates a predatory, attractive eye shape often referred to as 'hunter eyes'.

Gonial Angle115 degrees
Ideal:110-125 degrees

A lower gonial angle provides a more 'square' and masculine jaw appearance.

Structure

Upper Eyelid Exposure0mm
Ideal:0-1mm

Minimal eyelid exposure creates a more intense, hooded, and attractive gaze.

Nasal Tip Rotation100 degrees
Ideal:90-105 degrees

Slightly upturned tip is considered highly aesthetic and youthful.

Chin Projection (E-Line)On line
Ideal:On or slightly behind line

Strong chin projection balances the profile and defines the jawline.

Analysis Summary

Halos
Hunter eyes (positive tilt, hooded)
Zygomatic prominence (high cheekbones)
Hollow cheeks
Low gonial angle
High-contrast coloring

Symmetry

Excellent

Harmony

9.5/10

Dimorphism

Highly Masculine

Estimated Age

22-26

The subject (Jordan Barrett) represents a rare combination of high sexual dimorphism (strong jaw, brow) and 'pretty boy' aesthetics (full lips, blonde hair, upturned nose). The facial structure is defined by extreme lateral zygomatic flare and a compact midface. The orbital region is the primary 'halo', exhibiting textbook 'hunter eye' characteristics.

Bone Structure vs Soft Tissue

The aesthetic is heavily driven by elite bone structure, though low body fat (soft tissue) is required to reveal the underlying definition.

Aging Assessment

Excellent bone structure (maxillary and zygomatic support) suggests a very favorable aging trajectory with minimal sagging.

Improvement Considerations

Priority Ranking

1. Maintenance of skin health; 2. Maintenance of low body fat.

Maintain low body fat percentage

High

Targets: Jawline and Cheekbones

The current definition relies on a very low body fat percentage to maintain hollow cheeks.

Sun protection (SPF 50+)

Medium

Targets: Skin Quality

Light skin and blonde hair are more susceptible to photo-aging; preservation is key.

Not Recommended

Any form of filler or implants, as the bone structure is already at the limit of aesthetic width.

Important Notice

Consult with a board-certified professional before undergoing any medical or surgical procedures.

Report generated on April 11, 2026